首页> 外文OA文献 >Effectiveness of online and mobile telephone applications ('apps') for the self-management of suicidal ideation and self-harm: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Effectiveness of online and mobile telephone applications ('apps') for the self-management of suicidal ideation and self-harm: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:在线和移动电话应用程序(“ apps”)对自杀意念和自我伤害的自我管理的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Online and mobile telephone applications (‘apps’) have the potential to improve the scalability of effective interventions for suicidal ideation and self-harm. The aim of this review was therefore to investigate the effectiveness of digital interventions for the self-management of suicidal ideation or self-harm. Methods: Seven databases (Applied Science & Technology; CENTRAL; CRESP; Embase; Global Health; PsycARTICLES; PsycINFO; Medline) were searched to 31 March, 2017. Studies that examined the effectiveness of digital interventions for suicidal ideation and/or self-harm, or which reported outcome data for suicidal ideation and/or self-harm, within a randomised controlled trial (RCT), pseudo-RCT, or observational pre-test/post-test design were included in the review. Results: Fourteen non-overlapping studies were included, reporting data from a total of 3,356 participants. Overall, digital interventions were associated with reductions for suicidal ideation scores at post-intervention. There was no evidence of a treatment effect for self-harm or attempted suicide. Conclusions: Most studies were biased in relation to at least one aspect of study design, and particularly the domains of participant, clinical personnel, and outcome assessor blinding. Performance and detection bias therefore cannot be ruled out. Digital interventions for suicidal ideation and self-harm may be more effective than waitlist control. It is unclear whether these reductions would be clinically meaningful at present. Further evidence, particularly with regards to the potential mechanisms of action of these interventions, as well as safety, is required before these interventions could recommended.
机译:背景:在线和移动电话应用程序(“应用程序”)有可能提高有效措施的可扩展性,以实现自杀意念和自残。因此,本综述的目的是调查数字干预对自杀意念或自我伤害的自我管理的有效性。方法:搜查了截至2017年3月31日的七个数据库(应用科学与技术;中央; CRESP; Embase;全球卫生; PsycARTICLES; PsycINFO; Medline)。该研究检查了数字干预对自杀意念和/或自我伤害的有效性。 ,或在随机对照试验(RCT),伪RCT或观察性试验前/试验后设计中报告自杀意向和/或自我伤害的结局数据的患者也纳入了评价。结果:包括14个非重叠研究,报告了来自3,356名参与者的数据。总体而言,数字干预与干预后自杀意念得分的降低有关。没有证据表明对自残或自杀未遂有治疗作用。结论:大多数研究在研究设计的至少一个方面存在偏见,尤其是参与者,临床人员和结果评估者盲目性方面。因此,不能排除性能和检测偏差。自杀意念和自我伤害的数字干预措施可能比候补名单控制更为有效。目前尚不清楚这些减少目前在临床上是否有意义。在建议这些干预措施之前,还需要进一步的证据,尤其是有关这些干预措施的潜在作用机制以及安全性的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号